Here is the main page for the 5 November, 2013 Congressional Briefing in the U.S. Senate, Tooling the U.S. Bioeconomy: Synthetic Biology. Speakers included Mary Maxon, Darlene Solomon, and Chris Voigt. Here is my contribution:
And here is the Q&A following the presentations, during which we got into issues of risk, security, public acceptance, etc:
Here is the full video of the BBC Horizons show on synthetic biology that aired earlier this year. My bit starts at 38:30, but you would do well to watch the whole thing. Oh, and spider goats!
A couple of weeks ago I spoke at an event run by the UPMC Center for Biosecurity, Preserving National Security: The Growing Role of the Life Sciences. Here is the video of my presentation, followed by Roger Breeze, with an introduction by Gigi Gronvall. There is a short panel discussion at the end of the clip. Video of the rest of the meeting is also online, along with a conference report (PDF).
Here are the archived video and slides from last week's meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. And here is the session with presentations from Drew Endy, Bonnie Bassler, and myself, followed by questions and discussion with the Commission and public.
Browser warning: When I ran it, something about the combination of Flash and the slide viewer caused Safari to freeze; Firefox was just fine.
The Economist has posted video from the World in 2010 Festival, held in Washington DC in early December. The Innovation panel is below, with me (Biodesic), Dean Kamen (DEKA Research), Dwayne Spradlin (Innocentive), and Kai Huang (Guitar Hero), moderated by Mathew Bishop (The Economist). (Here is a link to video selections from the rest of the event.) I was chatting with a reporter a few days ago who observed that everyone else on the panel is quite wealthy -- hopefully that bodes well for me in 2010. But maybe I am destined always to be the odd man out. C-Span is re-running the video periodically on cable if you want to watch it on a bigger screen, but I can't seem to find an actual schedule. (Here is their web version: Innovation in 2010.)
I have a couple of general thoughts about the event, colored by another meeting full of economists, bankers, and traders that I attended in the last week of December. I met a number of fantastically accomplished and interesting people in just a few hours, many of whom I hope will remain lifelong friends.
First, I have to extend my thanks to The Economist -- they have been very good to me over the last 10 years, beginning in 2000 by co-sponsoring (with Shell) the inaugural World in 2050 writing competition. (Here is my essay from the competition (PDF). It seems to be holding up pretty well, these 10 years later, save the part about building a heart. But at least I wasn't the only one who got that wrong.)
Here is a paraphrased conversation over drinks between myself and Daniel Franklin, the Executive Editor of the newspaper.
Me: I wanted to thank you for including me. The Economist has been very kind to me over the past decade.
Franklin: Well, keep doing interesting things.
Me: Umm, right. (And then to myself: Shit, I have a lot of work to do.)
On to the World in 2010 Festival. The professional economists and journalists present all seem to agree that we have seen the worst of the downturn, that the stimulus package clipped the bottom off of whatever we were falling into, and that employment gains going forward could be a long time in coming. Unsurprisingly, the Democratic politicians and operatives who turned up crowed about the effects of the stimulus, while the Republicans who spoke poo-pooed any potential bright spots in, well, just about everything.
At the other meeting I attended, last week in Charleston, SC, one panel of 10 people, composed Federal reserve and private bankers, traders, and journalists couldn't agree on anything. The recovery would be V shaped. No, no, W shaped. No, no, no, reverse square root shaped (which was the consensus at The World in 2010 Festival). No, no, no, no, L shaped. But even those who agreed on the shape did not agree on anything else, such as the availability of credit, employment, etc.
Basically, as far as I can tell, nobody has the slightest idea what the future of the US economy looks like. And I certainly don't have anything to add to that. Except, of course, that the future is biology.
Here is John Oliver's opening monologue from the Festival. He was absolutely hilarious. Unfortunately you can't hear the audience cracking up continuously. I nearly pissed myself. Several times. (Maybe the cocktails earlier in the evening contributed to both reactions.)
Back to Innovation in 2010. Dean Kamen had this nice bit in response to a question about whether the imperative to invent and innovate has increased in recent years (see 36:20 in the C-Span video): "7 billion people can't be recipients, they have to be part of the solution. And that is going to require advanced technologies to be properly developed and properly deployed more rapidly than ever before."
To this I can only add that we are now seeing more power to innovate put into the hands of individuals than has ever occurred in the history of humanity. Let's hope we don't screw up.